Hiscox QC accuses FCA of “tearing up the rule book on causation”

Coronavirus

Jonathan Gaisman, QC, branded parts of the Financial Conduct Authority’s arguments as camouflage, a misuse of language and “blurring every divisible thing into one amorphous mass” as he defended Hiscox in the ongoing business interruption test court case.

Gaisman began his online presentation to Mr Justice Butcher and Lord Justice Flaux on day five of the case by tackling the provider’s non-damage denial of access and public authority clauses.

Starting with the public authority clause he cited the four factors that needed to be present as set out in the defendants’ joint skeleton argument on causation.

This covered the sequence where the insured must prove loss has been caused by an interruption, caused by inability to use the insured premises

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Age? View our subscription options

Register

Sign up and gain access to five complimentary news articles every month.

Already have an account? Sign in here

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: