Lords Committee ‘unconvinced’ on FCA name and shame proposal

stopping systemic risk

The House of Lords Financial Services Regulation Committee is unconvinced on the FCA’s name and shame plans as it branded the consultation an “abject failure” and urged if concerns have not been addressed in the regulator’s second consultation the proposals should not go ahead.

The Financial Conduct Authority opened a consultation in February last year on a “step change” in being more transparent when opening an investigation into a firm. Normally, it does not comment on whether it is investigating an issue, and public notices appear only when the case has been resolved.

The cross-party committee has now published a report, Naming and Shaming: how not to regulate, following its inquiry on the FCA’s consultation paper.

The House of Lords committee concluded the authority

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk.

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@insuranceage.co.uk to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Insurance Age? View our subscription options

Register

Sign up and gain access to five complimentary news articles every month.

Already have an account? Sign in here

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have an Insurance Age account, please register now.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an indvidual account here: